Author: truecrimespodcast
Giuliano Mignini Describes How Amanda Knox Perverted the Course of Justice in Italy
The trial of the murder of Meredith Kercher was hijacked by unscrupulous actors associated with Innocence Projects in America. These people aligned themselves with the defense attorneys of Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito in order to exert undue influence on the trial – perverting the course of justice.
In the first instance of Knox and Sollecito’s trial (Massei) they were both found guilty of murdering Meredith Kercher (same as Rudy Guede.) Knox and Sollecito appealed this decision which led to the Hellmann instance which, with the help of American ‘expert’ interference, got them acquitted. This was appealed which led to the overwhelmingly publicized Nencini trial which reversed the acquittal, declaring Knox and Sollecito guilty once again. This final decision was forwarded to the Supreme Court (aka 5th Chambers of Cassation ) which normally confirms the final verdicts (in this case guilty) however an unusual event occurred where they retried the case and decided to acquit Knox and Sollecito. This was a final verdict, the trial was over. After this, Knox has repeatedly run the media circuit claiming to be ‘exonerated.’ But the Supreme court did not exonerate her or the others, in fact, they confirmed that the evidence of their guilt still stood but . . . maybe it wasn’t really enough. But wasn’t it? They were found guilty two our of three appeals trials and the single appeal they won was as the result of unprecedented outside interference.
This interference can be described as collusion of ‘experts’ hired to support Knox and came together after her intial guilty verdict (Massei.) Guliano Mignin writes in his book,
” . . . the “pro Amanda”lobby: . . lawyer Theodore Simon, the geneticist Bruce Boudowle, director of the Institute of Genetic Investigations, Vice President professor of the Genetic Investigation Department at the University of North Texas Health Science Center in Fort Worth (Texas) wrote a letter addressed to the Court of Assizes of Appeal of Perugia, at the request of the lawyers Simon Theodore, Carlo Dalla Vedova and Carla Del Grosso, in which he challenged the validity of the scientific analysis, while technically lacking the capacity of Knox Consultant in the
Giuliano Mignini: MEREDITH KERCHER CASE- A JUDICIAL AFFAIR BETWEEN TWO CONTINENTS
process. Another was Greg Hampikian, professor of genetics at the Boise State University in Idaho, who was offered as an expert to the Knox family as part of his work in the “Innocence
Project” association. For all these subjects, who were allowed to teach the Italian Scientific Police his work, the work, especially on DNA, carried out by the investigators was a kind of shame and their judgment would be taken up by the “independent” experts, as the Americans called them.”
This collusion of ‘experts’ who claimed to own ‘the science’ and exerted their unofficial influence to throw doubt on some of the evidence (DNA) used in the trial as well as to defame and attack the Italian justice system, one of the original prosecutors (Mignini), and to mislead the American public via the media. This resulted in perverting the course of justice in the Meredith Kercher murder trial and help launch a murder suspect into stardom as a ‘victim of the Italian justice system.’ Nothing could be further from the truth.
House of Medicine on Fire Dr. McCullough Speech
Amanda Knox wants another trial in Italy
‘Making a Murderer’ like Amanda Knox
Candace Owens systematically exposes the lies and omissions of the ‘Making a Murderer’ movie by Laura Ricciardi and Moira Demos. There is no doubt Ricciardi and Demos had the agenda of portraying a psychopath murderer as innocent.
What kind of depravity leads to film makers creating a movie to deceive the public about the vicious murder of an innocent young 25-year-old woman like Teresa Hallbach?
All for money and lots of it no doubt. The Innocence Fraud groups have deep pockets. The unfortunate reality we live in where ‘safe and effective’ really means ‘dangerous and deadly.’ The lack of morality in the media and justice groups seems to be spreading like turbo cancer.
‘Making a Murderer’ was a Netflix hit in 2015 so it is not surprising that they followed up with another murderer ‘mystery’ the Amanda Knox Documentary in 2016.
Another pack of lies, this time narrated with the strident voice of Knox herself. Shockingly, it included video of Meredith Kercher, that had never been seen before leading to questions of where it came from as the police had never seen it apparently. Even more unsettling, the video, in which Amanda silenced Meredith’s voice . . . again, appeared to show Knox stalking Meredith with the camera!
Murderers seem to get away with everything and a gullible segment of the public support them, ALL because of a Netflix show. Knox has made millions from her crimes in Italy and continues to do so to this day. Knox has even made a comedy about it since she thinks it’s funny to get away with murder.
RIP Meredith Kercher (1985-2007)
Nobody – but nobody – absolutely nobody, wants mRNA technology gene based COVID injections anymore (Pfizer, Moderna, BioNTech); it is ineffective, does not sterilize the virus & is DEADLY! it is DEAD!
Unreported Truths, good stack by Berenson, see below for sharing
‘RIP, mRNA.
The once-heralded vaccine biotechnology officially died last week after a long illness. Maybe myocarditis or Type 1 diabetes. Could have been a shingles infection. Or possibly just a mix of uselessness and nasty side effects.
Dr. Mandy Cohen, the director of the Centers for Disease Control, accidentally announced mRNA’s passing on Friday on X (aka Twitter). Wearing a blue dress and her trademark vapid smile, Dr. Cohen admitted barely 1 out of 50 Americans have received the new mRNA Omicron booster.
Hours later, Pfizer confirmed the death, saying it will write off nearly $1 billion in mRNA jab inventory because of weak demand. Pfizer expects the market for shots to be one-third smaller than it predicted just weeks ago – though its new estimate still appears too high.
Okay, mRNAs aren’t actually dead. But even as the CDC and vaccine manufacturers to promote the new booster with massive ad campaigns, demand has collapsed. And Wall Street has noticed.
Since the announcements Friday, shares in Moderna – which unlike Pfizer has no other products and relies only on mRNA Covid shots for revenue – have fallen almost 15 percent. Amazingly, Moderna is now off 80 percent from its peak in summer 2021 (its highest weekly close ever came Sept. 10, 2021, one day after President Biden announced Covid jab workplace mandates).
Even more amazingly, Moderna and Pfizer now trade lower than they did in November 2020, before the companies announced clinical trial results that seemed to show the jabs worked near-perfectly against Covid. Since then, the two companies have sharply underperformed the stock market as a whole.
It’s as if the trials never happened.
—
(Destroying inventory, plunging share prices, and Travis Kelce shilling for a vaccine he wouldn’t even be allowed to get in most other countries: TWO THINGS AT ONCE! Oh, wait, that’s three.)
—
On a conference call to discuss Monday morning, Dr. Albert Bourla, Pfizer’s chairman and the World’s Favorite Veterinarian (TM), knew just who to blame for the shortfall in demand: anti-vaxxers.
“We are experiencing a peak of anti-vaccination rhetoric,” Bourla told investors. (Full disclosure: Bourla is a defendant in Berenson v. Biden, my federal lawsuit over the conspiracy to violate my First Amendment rights and ban me from Twitter in 2021.)
On the call, Bourla predicted about one in six Americans, or 55 million people, would take this year’s booster during the 2023-24 vaccination season. Less than a month ago – after the rollout had begun – Pfizer predicted the figure would be about one in four, or 82 million.
Put another way, Pfizer has cut its estimates for demand for the shots by one-third in a matter of weeks.
But even the new 55 million figure may be too high. It equals the number of the “bivalent” boosters given during the 2022/23 jab season – and Bourla told an analyst that Pfizer is simply assuming “the people that did it this year will continue doing it next year.”
Unfortunately for Pfizer and Moderna, that assumption so far is holding up about as well as the real-world protection the jabs provide. Politico reported yesterday that about 8 million shots had been administered this fall, compared to about 14 million bivalents at the same time last year. If demand continues at the same pace, that would translate into about 30 million shots this year – less than 10 percent of Americans.
And even that figure may be too high, because demand for the boosters has been front-loaded, so the gap may only widen over time. Further, Pfizer – which said Friday it plans to cut $3.5 billion in costs to help shore up profits – will likely pull much of its advertising and marketing for the shots soon if demand doesn’t pick up.
—
(Moderna? More like Last-year-a!)
—
Of course, Moderna and other companies will not stop trying to use mRNA biotechnology to try to develop vaccines. Moderna already has an mRNA jab for flu in late-stage trials.
But demand for existing flu shots, which are based on older and far simpler and more tested technology than the mRNAs, has remained strong and will far outpace the Covid jabs this year.
In other words, people aren’t rejecting the idea of an annual booster for a respiratory virus, they are rejecting the mRNAs specifically – because of side effects, lack of efficacy, or both. It is hard to think of another product – any other product – where public opinion has shifted so dramatically and quickly as the mRNA jabs. In two years, people have gone from begging for them to avoiding them.
So it’s equally hard to see how the mRNAs can ever compete directly with the older-style flu shots (or any vaccines based on more proven technology), much less get a premium price from insurer or patients.
Investors have clearly reached this conclusion, which is why they’re fleeing Moderna (and BioNTech, which supplies Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine).
Oh well. It was fun while it lasted.
Actually it wasn’t.’
Joran van der Sloot finally confesses to murder (after initially blaming a black man – just like Amanda Knox did)
The psychopath who extinguished the life of Natalee Hollaway in 2005, has finally confessed. Not out of a guilty conscience, of course, psychopaths don’t feel guilt. Van der Sloot admitted his guilt in order to facilitate a plea deal in his current conviction for extortion.
Van der Sloot said he killed Natalee Holloway on a beach, bludgeoned her face with a cinderblock and then disposed of her body in the ocean . . .
Van der Sloot said Natalee Holloway had wanted to go back to her hotel that night, but he arranged for the two to get dropped off “a little bit further away from her hotel so we could walk back … and I might still get a chance to be with her,” van der Sloot said in the meeting with prosecutors.
As the two walked alone on the beach, van der Sloot said he “laid her down” and they began kissing, and then Holloway told him to stop.
But he said he kept pursing her, and Natalee Holloway “knees me in the crotch,” van der Sloot said, according to the transcript.
“When she knees me in the crotch I get up on the beach and I kick her extremely hard in the face,” he continued.
He said the teen was then “laying down unconscious, possibly even dead,” according to the transcript.
Van der Sloot told prosecutors he then found a cinderblock on the beach and “smashed” her head with it.
He said he walked into the ocean up to his knees and pushed Natalee Holloway’s body into the water.
https://abcnews.go.com/US/joran-van-der-sloot-suspect-natalee-holloway-case/story?id=104035551
Van der Sloot was sentenced to 20 years in prison to run concurrently with the sentence he received for murdering another young woman, Peruvian Stephany Flores. He will also have to pay restitution to Beth Holloway.
Everyone already knew van der Sloot did it, but he tried to deny it. He even falsely accused an innocent black man, just like Amanda Knox did when she was investigated for the murder of Meredith Kercher.
At least, Natalee’s parents get some closure to this unwarranted act of depravity. Unlike Meredith Kercher’s parents who were left with questions until the day they died.
Art with quotes from Giuliano Mignini’s book
True Crimes Podcast 